Always good to see your comments, Cassie. Only the messenger was challenged and chided. None of the facts were challenged.
One State Rep found me guilty of presenting documented research at a legislative hearing without a degree in political science, and without citations to papers peer-reviewed by political scientists. Nevertheless, the public can still learn the truth.
I've always been a big proponent of "reproducible research" so I'd be happy to help anyone reproduce any of the numbers I presented.
More question "they" cannot answer. The old "you are not an expert", so old. Obviously they (committee) have not heard of the Asche, Milgram, or Stanford psychology experiments. Calling some one an 'expert' or giving them status has nothing to do with data. But it sure can be persuasion (or in this case a deterrent) to believe someone's statements. By tossing out the "you are not an expert" throws shade, so others will not beleive any statements of fact. Same play book over and over.
Always good to see your comments, Cassie. Only the messenger was challenged and chided. None of the facts were challenged.
One State Rep found me guilty of presenting documented research at a legislative hearing without a degree in political science, and without citations to papers peer-reviewed by political scientists. Nevertheless, the public can still learn the truth.
I've always been a big proponent of "reproducible research" so I'd be happy to help anyone reproduce any of the numbers I presented.
Excellent work, as always, Earl. Really appreciate it.
More question "they" cannot answer. The old "you are not an expert", so old. Obviously they (committee) have not heard of the Asche, Milgram, or Stanford psychology experiments. Calling some one an 'expert' or giving them status has nothing to do with data. But it sure can be persuasion (or in this case a deterrent) to believe someone's statements. By tossing out the "you are not an expert" throws shade, so others will not beleive any statements of fact. Same play book over and over.
Super happy they saw through your attempt to punish Democrats. Glad they are addressing how biased your research is.